CO129-409 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [1-3] — Page 175

174

ino njne aerqer d.dal .of Janu beton ad oals blvorie J

Tuqtairson and did donð sú •y notwo ynoxgnoli ni 00 18

Ilv↑ Juarezqur ta. bib euşit sequi s'randissimo)

·

od BL8q48,boððbætanú need ove od sikuwa noŁAW MO

boo siger bu. ore „radala beuntium „Tai la beɑlson need svad

oh bas „Iuni ̧ÐƐ JIVOU SWGrquƐ una mi DUBAIX MELA TA

ni boɖoïque need ‚re'iamid 8'sac (wiẩn lí oở roing,baa

of evilto Jeof bas to Joestrinɖab "m/bŰ yana, sát

Jİ (YTOJA BİN to sailtuo zed ɣzani.ilenq tad edelgemo

to lure and jč♫t[‚redma, qəƐ ni tans benoidnom od danas

-noivaimo) ytuqeɑ end of rebro jenol yu dnes saw ER.ELM

TodandainiabĄ Iaioitto odt to saan sud mi wyrażasoli 10-

njiw Jieel so LIỀw nolu BGODEJ Muotio zabaw yaozgnol

Jand beviendo su SIMUL * La lliw dI „droger sind nk tojai

tu mwa Intod and sateiqi o noiseimanetið betoven mådd

ayımuin) beassonb e. ♬ To savidelen sad of suİ EV.EISH

ermoed di sawoo tu diz odlå moismaug soT „diniƐ

but of an sav ariupne vd eATJÀ MON TUOY not pranuages.

bojoelle saw yonɑu min to noiseimmand acid do late ni yaw

FLEX:

• "DOCUMM Y'IAIibrasstre aing Ni

Paaresen ai di yiroqonq moitisog and suÅLETO ÚJ TODEO nI .(d)

Jning on si sten, dojow of na mins) mu rabismos od yz

Oven yarı anaoutų Brit vroðunîsidaanu novawol Jameel ja

suð ni yĩa.oduto nam di Jarit snolo ni dost on need

...IA .T Jero buen od prunigan dwel emorqul .studen sind 1ɩ seano ni mibal oð noissİnsamið vol yenom

-ennu əd nə yenom bid jeano edd od ɣils.rom blươw as ‚1

superio e to equur son ni yajaijoki and bewoner beddin-

sono quid mi sa leau aupario nowe „Ytukseti odt mott ¿TOURTA BİNİ, Ha Iuisitto est „mayai and yď beatcine ed að KHI hơn thêm ở Giahan đã minh bananas griseu ban

•

+

Did Ou DeBourg bicom passed við da ti drsone bluom (mac

conul a tot noijasilqqa nøddire a exam ‚eni?10 Ju04

督

To seinnok su ni enitto euid mi Teb10 gut berjia testøl A holjagup ni redde and oð TJTJBİJOH

A

Registrar or a Deputy Registrar acquainting the consign-

-ee of the fact that the sum to be remitted had been

forwarded by Money Order through the Post Office would

be directed to the consignee; auch letter would be pre-

-pared by Mr. Alim Khan and the only immediate check on his operations would appear to have been the presumed \ presence, in the Registry File, of the Post Office

receipt and at a later date the receipt of a letter from the consignee acknowledging the remittance. In this case Mr. Alim Khan states that he followed what was the

usual course of procedure; namely, that, having received the money from the Bank he proceeded to the Post Office where he found at the Money Order Counter, the clerk

Muhamed Akbar; that he then, at the request of Muhamed Akbar, made out two applications for money orders split- -ing the amount of 8213.93 into two separate portions, one of $100 and the other of $113.93. Mr. Alim Khan

states that he had, at the request of Muhamed Akbar, similarly split sume for transmission prior to this occasion, but that he did not know for what reason Muhamed Akbar required this division of the amount to be transmitted; that he duly received two receipts from Muhamed Akbar and that, having received them, he returne to the Registry where he filed them with the dossier of papers relating to the estate and that the letter to the Hoshiarpur Commissioner was forwarded in the usual course of procedure; that with regard to what is alleged to have taken place subsequently he knows nothing at all. Muhamed Akbar's account is totally different; he states that Hr. Alim Khan came to the Post Office on the 14th. June, 1913, and made an application for the trans- -mission by Money Order to the Deputy Commissioner of Hoshiarpur of 8100; that Mr. Alim Khan did not come in April at all; and that his story of the splitting of the amount of $213.93 into two portions is not true. Mr.

Khawas

£